Question:
dose anyone out there think aliens are real?Or Bigfoot?
2007-05-06 18:50:32 UTC
dose anyone out there think aliens are real?Or Bigfoot?
23 answers:
Psychic Cat
2007-05-06 20:23:19 UTC
All I can say is, it would be rather close-minded to think we're the only life, energy, intelligence or "force" in all the infinite galaxies. PLEASE. Think of this: An astronomer was almost executed by the church for proclaiming that the sun, & not the earth, was the center of the universe. The astronomer was severely punished for implying that God had placed mankind somewhere other than the "center of His universe. Ego? As for Bigfoot, well, if there has for so long been a Bigfoot, I'd wonder why there weren't more!
bravozulu
2007-05-08 01:31:20 UTC
Aliens may be real. There is no reason to beleive they wouldn't be real. Bigfoot is probably real. The evidence surrounding the Patterson/Gimlin film is hard to ignore. There has never been any credible evidence to suggest the film is a hoax. I know what I am talking about concerning the subject of Bigfoot. I am a scientist who has been studying Bigfoot as a hobby for over 20 years.
Bunge
2007-05-06 20:17:44 UTC
I don't know enough about Bigfoot to really make a yes/no decision on that.. Aliens I can, I have seen UFOs since I was 8 yrs old ( I am now 50 ).. I am a multiple abductee, and so join the ranks of millions of people worldwide, who also have been taken..I can tell you this, I have been spiritually enlightened since I was 8 yrs old, that's when they first took me...All our respective Governments will continue to deny their existence as questions have been asked and they didn't like the answers... Think about it, if you had 3 questions you could ask an ET, what would they be ?? I bet one would be about religion / spirituality, that has been answered.. That's why they cover it up, also we are being visited by 3 different races and they all have different agenda's.. The "Greys" are usually the ones who abduct us but not always... Love and Light.. BB.. )O(
too_b_ur_self
2007-05-07 18:59:59 UTC
I would not put a pass of anything in terns of Aliens or Bigfoot being somewhere around this world. I only say this for a simple reason, that the Government hides so many things from us; it's unbelievable. Aliens... For sure I believe in them, and I really think the Government is hiding them from all of us. Government, also hides a lot more then just Aliens.



My opinion only.
albertina
2016-05-17 10:51:49 UTC
Alien Life
Josette F
2007-05-06 19:41:46 UTC
I think that there are other beings or aliens out there in the universe than just us here on earth. They are probly more intellagent than we give them credit for, so i guess the answer is yes. As for Bigfoot i have never seen one not that i don't think that Bigfoot exist, i am just saying that in my lifetime i have yet to see on up close and personal.
2007-05-06 18:59:24 UTC
I think aliens are real, don't know about Bigfoot :-D
2007-05-06 21:42:48 UTC
yes i believe in aliens

And i think its possible Bigfoot might be real
joeysanoxLiDragon
2007-05-06 19:12:55 UTC
Bigfoot is actually an Alien ! there i said it..you all know they both exist,now you know they exist as one...and the same..don't ever let the men in black tell ya otherwise
Lucid
2007-05-06 20:41:15 UTC
aliens are real..and i dont mean big flying spaceships though i mean outer space bacteria and those other living beings that are microscopicand about Bigfoot i dont really know yet.
bianca m
2007-05-06 21:05:01 UTC
well i dont exactly believe in aliens but if our sun is a star and has nine or ten planets rotating around it than if there are other stars in the universe than who knows whether or not there is actually other life forms out there other than us, and whether or not there is actuallly other planets like earth in different galaxies.
MaggieMaeBrowne
2007-05-06 18:57:52 UTC
Someone asked this a little while ago.



Yeah, Bigfoot's real. I dated him. Nice enough guy. Large feel. Excessive chest hair. Commitment issues.
2007-05-06 18:54:42 UTC
I believe that there is gorillas that people think is bigfoot and ur wierd if u believe in aliens
grace.
2007-05-06 18:55:05 UTC
No....Aliens aren't real neither BigFoot.
2007-05-06 20:09:01 UTC
Yes. I've seen pictures of both on TV, so it must be true.
~MEEEOW~
2007-05-06 19:28:11 UTC
It would be insane to think that we are the only planet to sustain life!!
bradxschuman
2007-05-06 18:53:59 UTC
Aliens...real.

Bigfoot...NOT real.
Experto Credo
2007-05-06 19:21:11 UTC
I do. I guess that makes me a fool, right?
wweraw0304
2007-05-06 18:55:38 UTC
probably, but people either just dont believe or see
jackie
2007-05-06 19:00:22 UTC
What is real?
Jessica
2007-05-06 19:40:46 UTC
No, and no again. :-)
2007-05-06 18:58:34 UTC
I believe you are an idiot.
ABHIRAM M
2007-05-06 23:12:34 UTC
Extraterrestrial life is the past or present existence of life originating outside the limits of the Earth. Currently, extraterrestrial life remains hypothetical, as there is no evidence of extraterrestrial life that has been widely accepted by the scientific community. Some, however, point to moons of Jupiter or Saturn (most notably Europa and Titan respectively, which are believed by scientists to have oceans of water under their icy surfaces), and most recently Gliese 581 c which is the only known extrasolar planet in habitable zone and is predicted to have liquid water, or other celestial bodies that might conceivably have some forms of life (bacterial or otherwise).



Most scientists think that if extraterrestrial life exists, its evolution occurred independently, in different places. An alternative hypothesis, held by a minority, is panspermia. This suggests that life could have been created elsewhere and spread across the universe, between habitable planets. These two hypotheses are not mutually exclusive.



The common study and theorization of extraterrestrial life is known as astrobiology or xenobiology. Speculative forms of extraterrestrial life range from sapient beings to life at the scale of bacteria. Since no examples of confirmed extraterrestrial life are available for examination, these studies presently remain within the realm of speculation.









other than green might dominate plant life on exoplanets[1]Main articles: Biochemistry and Alternative biochemistry

All life on Earth is based on the building block element carbon with water as the solvent in which biochemical reactions take place. The combination of carbon and water in the chemical form (CH2O)n, is the chemical form of the sugars, which as well as providing the energy on which life depends (largely through the oxidation of glucose, a six carbon sugar), also provides structural elements for life (such as the sugar ribose, a five carbon sugar, in the molecules DNA and RNA). Life requires carbon in both reduced (methane derivatives) and partially-oxidized (carbon oxides) states. It also requires nitrogen as a reduced ammonia derivative in all proteins, sulfur as a derivative of hydrogen sulfide in some necessary proteins, and phosphorus oxidized to phosphates in genetic material and in energy transfer. Adequate water as a solvent supplies adequate oxygen as constituents of biochemical substances.



Pure water is useful because it has a neutral pH, due to its continued dissociation between hydroxide and hydronium ions.



As a result, it can dissolve both positive metallic ions and negative non-metallic ions with equal ability. Furthermore, the fact that organic molecules can be either hydrophobic (repelled by water) or hydrophilic (soluble in water) creates the ability of organic compounds to orient themselves to form water-enclosing membranes. The fact that solid water (ice) is less dense than liquid water also means that ice floats, thereby preventing Earth's oceans from slowly freezing solid. Additionally, the Van der Waals forces between water molecules give it an ability to store energy with evaporation, which upon condensation is released. This helps moderate climate, cooling the tropics and warming the poles, helping to maintain a thermodynamic stability needed for life.

Carbon is fundamental to terrestrial life for its immense flexibility in creating covalent chemical bonds with a variety of non-metallic elements, principally nitrogen, oxygen and hydrogen. Carbon dioxide and water together enable the storage of solar energy in sugars, such as glucose. The oxidation of glucose releases biochemical energy needed to fuel all other biochemical reactions.

The ability to form organic acids (-COOH) and amine bases (NH2-) gives it the possibility of neutralisation dehydrating reactions to build long polymer peptides and catalytic proteins from monomer amino acids, and with phosphates to build not only DNA, the information storing molecule of inheritance, but also adenosine triphosphate (ATP) the principal energy "currency" of cellular life.

Given their relative abundance and usefulness in sustaining life it has long been assumed that life forms elsewhere in the universe will also utilize these basic components. However, other elements and solvents might be capable of providing a basis for life. Silicon is usually considered the most likely alternative to carbon, though this remains improbable. Silicon life forms are proposed to have a crystalline morphology, and are theorized to be able to exist in high temperatures, such as planets closer to the sun. Life forms based in ammonia rather than water are also considered, though this solution appears less optimal than water.[2]



Indeed, technically life is little more than any self-replicating reaction, which could arise in a great many conditions and with various ingredients, though carbon-oxygen within the liquid temperature range of water seems most conducive. Suggestions have even been made that self-replicating reactions of some sort could occur within the plasma of a star, though it would be highly unconventional, since plasma is essentially the fourth state of matter, where electrons are not bound in their orbits around atomic nuclei.





[edit] Evolution and morphology

Along with the biochemical basis of extraterrestrial life, there remains a broader consideration of evolution and morphology. Science fiction has long shown a bias towards humanoid and/or reptilian forms. The classical alien is light green or grey skinned, with a large head, and the typical four limb and two to five digit structure—i.e., it is fundamentally humanoid with a large brain to indicate great intelligence. Other subjects from animal mythos such as felines and insects have also featured strongly in fictional representations of aliens.



A division has been suggested between universal and parochial (narrowly restricted) characteristics. Universals are features which have evolved independently more than once on Earth (and thus presumably are not difficult to develop) and are so intrinsically useful that species will inevitably tend towards them. These include flight, sight, photosynthesis and limbs, all of which have evolved several times here on Earth with differing materialization. There is a huge variety of eyes, for example, many of which have radically different working schematics as well as different visual foci: the visual spectrum, infrared, polarity and echolocation. Parochials, by contrast, are essentially arbitrary evolutionary forms which often serve little inherent utility (or at least have a function which can be equally served by dissimilar morphology) and probably will not be replicated. Parochials include the five digits of mammals and the curious and often fatal conjunction of the feeding and breathing passages found within many animals, although it is possible this conjunction allowed for the evolution of human speech.[citation needed]



A consideration of which features are ultimately parochial, challenges many taken-for-granted notions about morphological necessity. Skeletons, which are essential to large terrestrial organisms according to the experts of the field of Gravitational biology, are almost assuredly to be replicated elsewhere in one form or another, yet the vertebrate spine—while a profound development on Earth—is just as likely to be unique. Similarly, it is reasonable to expect some type of egg laying amongst off-Earth creatures but the mammary glands which set apart mammals might be a singular case.



The assumption of radical diversity amongst putative extraterrestrials is by no means settled. While many exobiologists do stress that the enormously heterogeneous nature of Earth life foregrounds even greater variety in space, others point out that convergent evolution may dictate substantial similarities between Earth and off-Earth life. These two schools of thought are called "divergionism" and "convergionism", respectively.[3]





[edit] Beliefs in extraterrestrial life



[edit] Ancient and early modern ideas

See also: Cosmic pluralism

Belief in extraterrestrial life may have been present in ancient, Assyria, Egypt, Arabia, China, Babylon, India and Sumer, although in these societies, cosmology was fundamentally supernatural and the notion of alien life is difficult to distinguish from that of gods, demons, and such. The first important Western thinkers to argue systematically for a universe full of other planets and, therefore, possible extraterrestrial life were the ancient Greek writers Thales and his student Anaximander in the 7th and 6th centuries B.C. The atomists of Greece took up the idea, arguing that an infinite universe ought to have an infinity of populated worlds. Ancient Greek cosmology worked against the idea of extraterrestrial life in one critical respect, however: the geocentric universe, championed by Aristotle and codified by Ptolemy, favored the Earth and Earth-life (Aristotle denied there could be a plurality of worlds) and seemingly rendered extraterrestrial life philiosophically untenable. Lucian in his novels described inhabitants of the Moon and other celestial bodies as humanoids, but with significant differences from humans.





Giordano Bruno, De l'Infinito, Universo e Mondi, 1584 Photo courtesy of P.C.Authors of ancient Jewish sources also considered extraterrestrial life. The Talmud states that there are at least 18,000 other worlds, but provides little elaboration on the nature of the worlds and on whether they are physical or spiritual. Based on this, however, the medieval exposition "Sefer HaB'rit" posits that extraterrestrial creatures exist but that they have no free will (and are thus equivalent to animal life). It adds that human beings should not expect creatures from another world to resemble earthly life, any more than sea creatures resemble land animals.[4][5]



Hindu beliefs of endlessly repeated cycles of life have led to descriptions of multiple worlds in existence and their mutual contacts ( Sanskrit word Sampark means 'contact' as in Mahasamparka = the great contact). However the relevance of such descriptions have to be evaluated in the context of understanding of geography and science at those times.



Within Islam, the statement of the Qur'an "All praise belongs to God, Lord of all the worlds" indicates multiple universal bodies and maybe even multiple universes that may indicate extraterrestrial and even extradimensional life. Surat Al-Jinn also mentioned a statement from a Jinn regarding the current status and ability of his group in the heavens. A more direct reference from Quran is presented by Mirza Tahir Ahmad as a proof that life on other planets may exist according to Quran. In his book, Revelation, Rationality, Knowledge & Truth, he quotes verse 42:30 "And among His Signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth, and of whatever living creatures (da'bbah) He has spread forth in both..."; according to this verse there is a possibility of life in heavens. According to the same verse "And He has the power to gather them together (jam-'i-him) when He will so please"; there is a chance of close encounter in the future.[6]



When Christianity spread throughout the West, the Ptolemaic system became very widely accepted, and although the Church never issued any formal pronouncement on the question of alien life[7] at least tacitly the idea was aberrant. In 1277 the Bishop of Paris, Étienne Tempier, did overturn Aristotle on one point: God could have created more than one world (given His omnipotence) yet we know by revelation He only made one. Taking a further step and arguing that aliens actually existed remained rare. Notably, Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa speculated about aliens on the moon and sun.



This situation changed, however, with the dramatic shift in thinking initiated by the invention of the telescope and the Copernican assault on geocentric cosmology. Once it became clear that the Earth was merely one planet amongst countless bodies in the universe the extraterrestrial idea moved towards the scientific mainstream. God's omnipotence, it could be argued, not only allowed for other worlds and other life, on some level it necessitated them. The best known early-modern proponent of such ideas was Giordano Bruno, who argued in the 16th century for an infinite universe in which every star is surrounded by its own solar system; he was eventually burned at the stake by the Catholic church for his heretical ideas. In the early 17th century the Czech astronomer Anton Maria Schyrleus of Rheita mused that "if Jupiter has…inhabitants…they must be larger and more beautiful than the inhabitants of the Earth, in proportion to the [characteristics] of the two spheres."[8] Dominican monk Tommaso Campanella wrote about a Solarian alien race in his Civitas Solis.



Such comparisons also appeared in poetry of the era. In "The Creation: a Philosophical Poem in Seven Books" (1712) Sir Richard Blackmore observed: "We may pronounce each orb sustains a race / Of living things adapted to the place". The didactic poet Henry More took up the classical theme of the Greek Democritus in "Democritus Platonissans, or an Essay Upon the Infinity of Worlds" (1647). With the new relative viewpoint that the Copernican revolution had wrought, he suggested "our world's sunne / Becomes a starre elsewhere." Fontanelle's "Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds" (translated into English in 1686) offered similar excursions on the possibility of extraterrestrial life, expanding rather than denying the creative sphere of a Maker.



The possibility of extraterrestrials remained a widespread speculation as scientific discovery accelerated. William Herschel, the discoverer of Uranus, was one of many 18th-19th century astronomers convinced that our Solar System, and perhaps others, would be well populated by alien life. Other luminaries of the period who championed "cosmic pluralism" included Immanuel Kant and Benjamin Franklin. At the height of the Enlightenment even the Sun and Moon were considered candidates for hosting aliens.





[edit] Extraterrestrials and the modern era



The Arecibo message is a digital message sent to globular star cluster M13, and is a well-known symbol of human attempts to contact extraterrestrialsThis enthusiasm toward the possibility of alien life continued well into the 20th century. Indeed, the roughly three centuries from the Scientific Revolution through the beginning of the modern era of solar system probes were essentially the zenith for belief in extraterrestrials in the West: many astronomers and other secular thinkers, at least some religious thinkers, and much of the general public were largely satisfied that aliens were a reality. This trend was finally tempered as actual probes visited potential alien abodes in the solar system. The moon was decisively ruled out as a possibility, while Venus and Mars, long the two main candidates for extraterrestrials, showed no obvious evidence of current life. The other large moons of our system which have been visited appear similarly lifeless, though the interesting geothermic forces observed (Io's volcanism, Europa's ocean, Titan's thick atmosphere) have underscored how broad the range of potentially habitable environments may be. Although the hypothesis of a deliberate cosmic silence of advanced extraterrestrials is also a possibility,[9] the failure of the SETI program to detect anything resembling an intelligent radio signal after four decades of effort has partially dimmed the optimism that prevailed at the beginning of the space age. Emboldened critics view the search for extraterrestrials as unscientific, despite the fact the SETI program is not the result of a continuous, dedicated search but instead utilizes what resources and manpower it can, when it can.[10]



Thus, the three decades preceding the turn of the second millennium saw a crossroads reached in beliefs in alien life. The prospect of ubiquitous, intelligent, space-faring civilizations in our solar system appears increasingly dubious to many scientists. Still, in the words of SETI's Frank Drake, "All we know for sure is that the sky is not littered with powerful microwave transmitters." Drake has also noted that it is entirely possible advanced technology results in communication being carried out in some way other than conventional radio transmission. At the same time, the data returned by space probes and giant strides in detection methods have allowed science to begin delineating habitability criteria on other worlds and to confirm that, at least, other planets are plentiful though aliens remain a question mark.



The possible existence of primitive (microbial) life outside of Earth is much less controversial to mainstream scientists although at present no direct evidence of such life has been found. Indirect evidence has been offered for the current existence of primitive life on the planet Mars; however, the conclusions that should be drawn from such evidence remain in debate.



The funding and financing for research involving extraterrestrial life has generally been supported. However, in many instances, it has not. For example, in the United States, President George W. Bush's Fiscal Year 2007 NASA Budget cut funding for astrobiological research by 50 percent.[11]





[edit] Scientific search for extraterrestrial life

The scientific search for extraterrestrial life is being carried out in two different ways, directly and indirectly.





[edit] Direct search



The planned NASA Kepler mission for the search of extrasolar planetsScientists are directly searching for evidence of unicellular life within the solar system, carrying out studies on the surface of Mars and examining meteors that have fallen to Earth. A mission is also proposed to Europa, one of Jupiter's moons with a possible liquid water layer under its surface, which might contain life.



There is some limited evidence that microbial life might possibly exist or have existed on Mars. An experiment on the Viking Mars lander reported gas emissions from heated Martian soil that some argue are consistent with the presence of microbes. However, the lack of corroborating evidence from other experiments on the Viking indicates that a non-biological reaction is a more likely hypothesis. Recently, Circadian rhythms have been allegedly discovered in Viking data. The interpretation is controversial. Independently in 1996 structures resembling bacteria were reportedly discovered in a meteorite, ALH84001, thought to be formed of rock ejected from Mars. This report is also controversial and scientific debate continues (See Viking biological experiments).



In February 2005, NASA scientists reported that they had found strong evidence of present life on Mars.[12] The two scientists, Carol Stoker and Larry Lemke of NASA's Ames Research Center, based their claims on methane signatures found in Mars' atmosphere that resemble the methane production of some forms of primitive life on Earth, as well as their own study of primitive life near the Rio Tinto river in Spain. NASA officials soon denied the scientists' claims, and Stoker herself backed off from her initial assertions.[13]



Though such findings are still very much in debate, support among scientists for the belief in the existence of life on Mars seems to be growing. In an informal survey conducted at the conference in which the European Space Agency presented its findings, 75 percent of the scientists in attendance reported to believe that life once existed on Mars; 25 percent reported a belief that life currently exists there.[14]





[edit] Indirect search



Terrestrial Planet Finder - A planned Infrared interferometer for finding Earth-like extrasolar planets (as of 2007, it has not received the funding from NASA it needs — that funding is going towards the Kepler mission)It is theorised that any technological society in space will be transmitting information. Projects such as SETI are conducting an astronomical search for radio activity that would confirm the presence of intelligent life. A related suggestion is that aliens might broadcast pulsed and continuous laser signals in the optical as well as infrared spectrum;[15] laser signals have the advantage of not "smearing" in the interstellar medium and may prove more conducive to communication between the stars. And while other communication techniques including laser transmission and interstellar spaceflight have been discussed seriously and may not be infeasible, the measure of effectiveness is the amount of information communicated per unit cost, resulting with the radio as method of choice.





[edit] Extrasolar planets

Astronomers also search for extrasolar planets that would be conducive to life, especially those like Gliese 581 c and OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb, which have been found to have Earth-like qualities.[16][17] Current radiodetection methods have been inadequate for such a search, as the resolution afforded by recent technology is inadequate for detailed study of extrasolar planetary objects. Future telescopes should be able to image planets around nearby stars, which may reveal the presence of life (either directly or through spectrography which would reveal key information such as the presence of free oxygen in a planet's atmosphere):





Artist's Impression of Gliese 581 c, the first extrasolar planet discovered within its star's habitable zoneDarwin is an ESA mission designed to find Earth-like planets, and analyse their atmosphere.

The COROT mission, initiated by the French Space Agency, was launched in 2006 and is currently looking for extrasolar planets -- it is the first of its kind

The Terrestrial Planet Finder was supposed to be launched by NASA, but as of 2007, budget cuts have caused it to be delayed indefinitely

The Kepler Mission, largely replacing the Terrestrial Planet Finder, to be launched in November 2008

It has been argued that one of the best candidates for the discovery of life-supporting planets may be Alpha Centauri, the closest star system to Earth, given that two of the three stars in the system are broadly sun-like[citation needed]



On April 24, 2007, scientists at the European Southern Observatory in La Silla, Chile said they had found the first Earth-like planet. The planet orbits within the habitable zone of Gliese 581, a red dwarf star which is a scant 20.5 light years from Earth. Although much is still unknown about the planet, the scientists who discovered it suspect that it is non-gaseous and may contain liquid water. Whether the planet is home to life remains to be seen.[17]





[edit] Extraterrestrial life in the Solar System



This planetary habitability chart shows where life might exist on extrasolar planets based on our own Solar System and life on EarthMany bodies in the Solar System have been suggested as being capable of containing conventional organic life. The most commonly suggested ones are listed below; of these, four of the seven are moons, and are thought to have large bodies of underground liquid (streams), where life may have evolved in a similar fashion to deep sea vents.





Europa, due to the ocean under its icy crust, might host some form of microbial life[18][19]Mars - Liquid water is widely thought to have existed on Mars in the past and there may still be liquid water beneath the surface. Methane was found in the atmosphere of Mars. Recent photographs from Mars Global Surveyor show evidence of recent (within 10 years) flows of a liquid on the Red Planet's frigid surface. There is however uncertainty as to whether this was liquid water or CO2[20] Main article: Life on Mars

Europa - Europa may contain liquid water beneath its 100-mile ice layer, vents on the bottom of the ocean warm the ice so that 60 miles of liquid could exist beneath the ice layer, perhaps capable of supporting microbes and simple plants

Jupiter - Possible supporter of floating animals, as hypothesized by Carl Sagan. This point of view is somewhat controversial due to the fact that these creatures would not be water-based, but ammonia-based. [2]

Ganymede - Possible underground ocean (see Europa).

Callisto - Possible underground ocean (see Europa).

Saturn - Possible floating creatures (see Jupiter).

Enceladus - Geothermal activity, watervapour. Possible underice oceans heated by tidal effects.

Titan (Saturn's largest moon) - The only known moon with a significant atmosphere was recently visited by the Huygens probe. Latest discoveries indicate that there is no global or widespread ocean, but small and/or seasonal liquid hydrocarbon lakes are almost surely present on the surface.[21][22]

Numerous other bodies have been suggested as potential hosts for microbial life. Fred Hoyle has proposed that life might exist on comets, as some Earth microbes managed to survive on a lunar probe for many years. However, it is considered highly unlikely that complex multicellular organisms of the conventional chemistry of terrestrial life (animals, plants) could exist under these living conditions.



i do think there are aliens out there and when u look into sky u will fell that ur not alone


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...